|
Federal
Spending
Overview
Federal
Spending in the Northeast-Midwest
The Northeast-Midwest
Institute and the Northeast-Midwest Congressional and Senate Coalitions
have tracked and analyzed federal spending and taxation patterns
since their founding in the mid-1970s. Most states in the Northeast
and Midwest contribute more in taxes to the federal government than
they receive back in federal spending, which means the Northeast-Midwest
region subsidizes federal spending in the rest of the country. The
factors driving the Northeast-Midwest's low return on federal tax
dollar vary within the region. In the Northeast as a whole, higher
than average per-capita taxation yields a low return on dollar despite
relatively high levels of federal spending. In the Midwest, the
low return on federal tax dollar stems from relatively low levels
of federal spending.
Factors
that Influence Federal Spending
The consistency
of federal spending, taxation, and return on dollar trends over
time points to the stubborn nature of what determines the federal
balance of payments for a state or region. An elected official has
limited control over the flow of federal funds into and out of a
state, and little opportunity to spur dramatic changes from one
year to the next. Factors that influence federal spending and taxation
patterns include the following:
- Demographics
– a state's share of residents aged 65 or older and under
18 helps determine spending levels for many federal programs designed
to assist the elderly and children.
- Economic
well-being – high poverty rates and low income levels in
a state increase the likelihood of federal spending on assistance
programs, while high incomes reduce the likelihood of such federal
spending and increase the federal tax burden.
- Industry
mix – a concentration of defense industries boosts federal
procurement dollars, and a concentration of farming increases
federal expenditures for agricultural assistance.
- Federal facilities
– the location of federal facilities determines state-by-state
federal spending on employee benefits, wages, and salaries, among
other items.
- Emergency
situations – targeted federal spending helps offset the impact
of unexpected and adverse developments, including natural disasters
and human catastrophes.
Reports and Tables
While quick
and dramatic changes to the regional flow of federal funds are unlikely,
the Northeast-Midwest Institute looks for opportunities to improve
federal spending and taxation patterns for the region over time.
The Northeast-Midwest Institute regularly publishes reports about
state and regional imbalances in federal spending. In addition,
the Institute works with the Northeast-Midwest Congressional and
Senate Coalitions to inform and educate policymakers about the impact
that federal legislation and programs have on spending patterns.
Attention is paid to federal funding formulas and to federal spending
on important regional issues.
- Northeast-Midwest
Guide to Federal Formula Grant Programs (large pdf file)
The
grants guide provides basic information and useful data about
each of the 50 largest federal formula grant programs to state
and local governments. (To see a list of the programs featured
in the grants guide, click here.) In
addition, the guide provides separate reports and data about how
each of the 18 Northeast-Midwest states fares for 158 federal
formula grant programs. After downloading, use the grants guide
table of contents to locate programs or states of interest.
- Annual
Tables for Flow of Federal Funds to the States
(Tax burden tables
will be updated upon release of
the most recent tax burden data.)
- Other Federal
Spending Tables
- Low-Income
Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and Weatherization
Additional
Resources
Consolidated Federal Funds Report, U.S. Census Bureau, Governments
Division, http://www.census.gov/govs/www/cffr.html:
Offers annual reports and data on federal spending traceable to
the states.
Home
| Top of Page
http://www.nemw.org/fedspend.htm
|