|
|
| |
About
the Project |
Analysis
& Findings |
Lessons
& Conclusion |
Project
Reports |
Contact
& Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protecting
and Restoring the South Florida Everglades
|
|
|
|
Florida Everglades from space: Source NASA/GSFC/LaRC/JPL,
MISR Team
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
About
the Ecosystem
The
South Florida ecosystem is a uniquely diverse system of subtropical
wetlands, uplands, and coastal and marine areas. Encompassing
more than 18,000 square miles, the ecosystem is dominated by the
watersheds of the Kissimmee River, Lake Okeechobee, and the Everglades.
The Everglades network of wetlands forms this ecosystem's most
crucial component. Fed by Lake Okeechobee, the second largest
natural lake entirely in the United States, the Everglades once
acted as a natural filter oscillating with the seasons over millions
of acres to support and provide habitat for diverse wildlife to
feed, shelter, and breed their young. This vast, free-flowing
river of grass extended from the Kissimmee chain of lakes to Florida
Bay, sustaining large populations of wading and migratory birds,
crocodiles, panthers, manatees, deer, and fish.

|
|
Ecosystem
Problems
Inappropriate
water management schemes, predominantly the Army Corps of Engineers'
C&SF Project built to address flood protection and provide
water for municipal and agricultural purposes, combined with increased
water demands and excessive drainage of wetlands, have significantly
contributed to the highly degraded state of the South Florida
ecosystem. Today, Lake Okeechobee provides drinking water for
over six-million people (three times more than the C&SF Project
originally intended) and serves as a source of irrigation for
a $1.5 billion-a-year agricultural industry. These use requirements
have changed the natural variability of water flow, water timing,
and water distribution, severely straining the ecosystem's ability
to perform its intended function, particularly in the Everglades.
Major
problems in the ecosystem include:
-
90-95
percent reduction in wading bird populations and continuing
reductions in the number of birds initiating breeding in the
ecosystem;
-
68
plant and animals species listed as threatened or endangered
(more than any other state in the U.S);
-
1
million acres of land under health advisories for mercury
contamination;
-
Over
1.5 million acres infested with invasive species and exotic
plants;
-
Declining
populations of commercially and recreationally important fish
species in the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee estuaries and
Biscayne and Florida bays;
-
Defoliation
of seagrasses, fish kills, and deformed fish within the St.
Lucie estuary;
-
Repetitive
water shortages and salt water intrusion;
-
More
than 50 percent reduction in the size of the Everglades compared
to 100 years ago;
-
70
percent less water flow through the ecosystem;
-
Over-efficient
draining of water from land resulting in 1.7 billion gallons
of water per day discharging into the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf
of Mexico;
-
Declining
water quality through increased levels of polluted runoff,
nutrients (e.g., phosphorus and nitrogen), and contaminants
(e.g., metals and pesticides), and soil erosion and subsidence;
-
Some
untreated urban and agricultural stormwater is sent directly
to natural areas and estuaries that are critical nurseries
and homes to many fish and wildlife; and
-
Not
enough water is available for urban and agricultural users
-- during the dry season, the current water regime is unable
to provide sufficient freshwater supplies for the natural
system, or for urban and agricultural consumers. Water shortages
and water restrictions are now a regular occurrence in some
parts of South Florida. Water conflicts may become more common
and more severe unless changes to the water management system
are made.
|
|
Ecosystem
Users
Residents
The South Florida region has grown to sustain over 6 million people,
encompassing seven of the ten fastest-growing metropolitan areas
in the country. In the next 20-25 years, South Florida's population
is expected to increase to 12 million people.
Industry
South Florida supports many industries, all with the potential
to grow considerably over the next few decades. The enormous and
booming tourism industry currently brings in $19 billion annually;
estuaries generate annual revenue of $18 million by providing
food and habitat to 70 percent of the commercially- and recreationally-harvested
fish and shellfish in the region; and the area's recreational
fishing industry imparts approximately $600 million to the region.
Agriculture
The region's productive agricultural industry generates more than
$1.2 billion worth of economic activity annually, sustaining more
than 40,000 jobs. Over 400,000 acres of the Everglades Agricultural
Area is planted with sugar cane, 60,000 with sweet corn, and 30,000
with rice. The remainder is planted with sundry vegetables, including
lettuces, radishes, and parsley.
Sugar
Industry
The Florida sugar industry grows and processes more than half
of all sugar grown in the United States, and more than a quarter
of the sugar sold domestically. The land area within the Everglades
Agricultural Area occupied by the sugar industry has nearly doubled
in size since the 1970's, causing further demand for water and
increasing polluted run-off. Environmentalists, scientists, and
federal and state officials have cited the vast quantities of
phosphorus produced by the industry's intensive farming practices
as a primary cause of the Everglades' collapse. Environmentalists
further assert that the federal government's sugar price-support
program and subsidies from the state of Florida for irrigation
and water management services have fueled the exponential growth
of the sugarcane industry and led to degradation of the Everglades
at a rate of three to five acres per day.
|
|
Ecosystem
Alteration
Below is
a timeline of major events and legislative actions that have
contributed to the large-scale alteration of the South Florida
Everglades:
Swamp
and Overflowed Lands Act of 1850
Five years after granting Florida statehood, Congress enacted
the Swamp and Overflowed Lands Act authorizing the vast bulk
transfer of land to states expressly for the purpose of selling
the land to generate revenue and promote development. The Act
resulted in more than 20 million acres of land being granted
to Florida.
Board
of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund, state legislature,
1855
To assure proper application of funds arising from the sale
of land granted by Congress under the Swamp and Overflowed Lands
Act of 1850, the Florida legislature created the Board of Trustees
of the Internal Improvement Fund.
Hamilton
Disston's construction projects, 1881 - 1894
After becoming fascinated with the possibility of reclaiming
swamp land to facilitate agricultural and residential development,
Philadelphia-native Hamilton Disston negotiated with Florida
Governor Bloxham and the Internal Improvement Fund to drain
all of the lands overflowed by Lake Okeechobee and the Kissimmee
River in exchange for one-half the reclaimed land. Disston further
purchased four million acres of land from the Internal Improvement
Fund in 1881 to not only bail the Fund out of debt, but also
to become the largest single land owner in the United States
at the time. By 1894, Disston's Land Company had conveyed nearly
1.2 million acres of land, resulting in the lowering of Lake
Okeechobee by 4 ½ feet, the development of many major
towns, and the dredging of a navigable waterway from Lake Okeechobee
north to the Kissimmee River and west to the Gulf of Mexico.
Rivers
and Harbors Appropriations Act of 1899
The federal Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of 1899 deemed
the construction of bridges, causeways, dams, and dikes over
or in navigable waters of the United States unlawful without
prior approval from the Secretary of Transportation. The Act
also gave the Army Corps of Engineers the authority to regulate
the obstruction of navigable waterways. Following enactment,
the Army Corps of Engineers began an evaluation of the Kissimmee
River's course to the ocean, leading through Lake Okeechobee
in South Florida.
Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1902
Through the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1902 Congress heeded the
Army Corps of Engineers' recommendations to improve navigation
in the Kissimmee River, authorizing a federal navigation project
to create and maintain a 109 mile channel -- three feet deep
by 30 feet wide -- from the town of Kissimmee to Fort Basinger.
Broward
elected Governor of Florida, 1904
On the promise to create an "Empire of the Everglades"
by draining the area, Napoleon Bonaparte Broward was elected
Governor of Florida.
Board
of Drainage Commissioners, state legislature, 1905
The Board of Drainage Commissioners was created by Florida legislature
to establish and maintain a system of canals, drains, levees,
dikes, and reservoirs in order to drain and reclaim the swamp
and overflowed lands of Florida and provide for irrigation of
the reclaimed lands. The Board also was empowered with establishing
drainage districts. This move marked the first regional authority
created by the state of Florida to implement water policy and
facilitate drainage of the Everglades.
Everglades
Drainage District, state legislature, 1907
At the recommendation of the Board of Drainage Commissioners,
the state legislature authorized a $250,000 tax-supported plan
to create a 7,150 square mile Everglades Drainage District.
Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1907
The federal Rivers and Harbors Act of 1907 authorized the Army
Corps of Engineers to construct a six-foot channel from the
Oklawaha River to Silver Springs.
Issuance
of drainage bonds, state government, 1912
The unexpectedly high cost of drainage construction prompted
the government of Florida to issue drainage bonds in order to
fund further development and boost land confidence.
Drainage
projects, 1913 - 1927
Six large drainage canals and numerous smaller canals totaling
440 miles, including 47 miles of levees and 16 locks and dams,
were constructed between 1913 and 1927. At a cost of $18 million
dollars, the resulting system of canals, levees, locks, and
dams provided the foundation for draining the northern and eastern
parts of the Everglades, allowing the area to be opened up for
farming.
Napoleon
B. Broward Drainage District, state legislature, 1917
The Napoleon B. Broward Drainage District was created by Florida's
legislature to oversee drainage and reclamation of a half million
acres in Broward County and northern Dade County.
Everglades
Agricultural Area development, 1919
The Everglades Agricultural Area, a 16,000 acre area of land
providing extraordinary crop yields to farmers, was developed
by William Conners. By 1920, most of the land in the area was
cultivated, with sugar cane, tomatoes, beans, peas, peppers,
and potatoes the first crops to be grown commercially. Agriculture
was, however, not a booming industry. Only two of the large
canals provided satisfactory outlets from Lake Okeechobee, the
others lacked the slope necessary to significantly reduce the
water level in the lake. The canals also did not provide sufficient
protection from overflow during unusual weather periods.
Okeechobee
Flood Control District, state legislature, 1929
The Florida land boom collapsed in 1926, resulting in the incompletion
of several drainage projects. Severe droughts, floods, and two
deadly hurricanes (killing thousands of residents) in 1926 and
1928 forced state legislators to form the Okeechobee Flood Control
District. Together with Army Corps of Engineers, the District
was authorized to conduct flood control activities, and to issue
bonds to generate funding for the completion of drainage projects.
Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1930
The extensive damage produced by the two hurricanes, including
the death of thousands of people, prompted the federal government
to become substantially involved in Everglades flood control
through the Army Corps of Engineers. After a personal inspection
of the area by President Hoover, the Army Corps of Engineers
drafted a new plan for flood control that provided for the construction
of floodway channels, control gates, and major levees along
Lake Okeechobee's shores. The River and Harbors Act of 1930
authorized the Army Corps of Engineers to undertake construction
of the Herbert Hoover Dike system, consisting of a series of
levees, gated culverts, and locks which encompass Lake Okeechobee.
Flood
Control Act of 1936
The Flood Control Act of 1936 gave additional authority to the
Army Corps of Engineers to improve, or participate in the improvement,
of navigable waters or their tributaries for flood control purposes.
Unusual
weather patterns, 1931-1945
Between 1931 and 1945, unusual weather patterns continued to
play a role in Everglades' manipulation. Prolonged dry periods,
including the worst drought in Florida's history, lowered groundwater
levels in the Everglades and exacerbated the threat of salt
intrusion into the municipal wells of Miami and other coastal
cities. The declining water levels also resulted in the peaty,
organic soils of the Everglades drying out and shrinking at
an intense rate, and the loss of thousands of acres of land
by fire. The events prompted the need for water conservation
in the area.
Army
Corps of Engineers - comprehensive plan, 1947
The weather again turned in 1947 drenching the South Florida
area with 100 inches of rain. Three weeks later, two hurricanes
and a tropical disturbance deposited more water, resulting in
90 percent of southeastern Florida being flooded, and damage
estimates over $59 million. The devastating series of events
prompted the urgent need for action to prevent further loss
of life and damage to property by floods, and to conserve water
for beneficial use during periods of droughts. Acting on the
requests of many concerned local agencies, and under authority
of various acts of Congress, and resolutions of appropriate
congressional committees, the Army Corps of Engineers orchestrated
numerous public hearings to evaluate local interest and devise
a plan. Offering the best solution was a comprehensive plan
for flood control and water conservation that satisfied the
major needs expressed by the various agencies, was beneficial
to the greatest number of residents and to the largest portion
of the area, and was carried out by the federal government,
in cooperation with local agencies. The Army Corps' comprehensive
plan was submitted to higher authority in December, 1947. To
address reoccurring problems in the area, the first phase of
the plan, known as the C&SF Project, called for flood control;
water level control; water conservation; prevention of salt
water intrusion; and preservation of fish and wildlife. Projects
were primarily centered on flood protection for the agricultural
development south of Lake Okeechobee and for the highly developed
urban area along the lower east coast of the state.
Flood
Control Act of 1948
Congress approved the first phase of the C&SF Project as
part of the Flood Control of Act of 1948.
Central
and Southern Florida Flood Control District, state legislature,
1949
The Governor of Florida approved the C&SF Project. The following
year, the Florida legislature created the Central and Southern
Florida Flood Control District, predecessor to the South Florida
Water Management District, and authorized the agency to maintain
structures created by the Army Corps of Engineers and to act
as a single local agency with which the federal government can
coordinate on local matters.
Flood
Control Act of 1954, 1958, 1960, 1962, 1965 and 1970
The Flood Control Act of 1954 authorized the second phase of
the C&SF Project comprising the remaining works of the original
comprehensive plan. Further improvements to the project were
authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1958, 1960, 1962 and
1965. The Flood Control Act of 1968 expanded the project to
provide for increased storage and conservation of water, improved
water distribution, and increased delivery of water to the Everglades
National Park. Recreation also was added as a project purpose.
Once completed, the C&SF Project resulted in a primary flood
control and water delivery system comprising over 1,000 miles
of levees, 720 miles of canals, nearly 2000 water control structures,
18 major pump stations, a 100-mile dike, and three temporary
water conservation areas.
Pumping
of phosphorus-rich water into Everglades, 1979
The South Florida Water Management District temporarily stopped
back-pumping phosphorus-rich water from the Everglades Agricultural
Area into Lake Okeechobee. Instead, the District began pumping
untreated farm runoff directly into the central Everglades.
The decision resulted in the spread of phosphorus-loving cattails
across the northern Everglades.

|
History
of Restoration Actions (1893-1991)
Below is
a timeline of restoration-related events and activities prior
to the establishment of a large-scale restoration program in
the South Florida Everglades:
Act to
protect manatees, state legislature, 1893
The Florida legislature enacted legislation to protect manatees
and prohibit them from being killed. The legislation also created
a fine of up to $500 or three months in prison for the capture
or killing of the species.
Lacey
Act of 1900
The federal Lacy Act of 1900 banned the interstate shipment
of any wild animals or birds killed in violation of state laws.
The law also gave the bird protection movement its first weapon
against the plume and market hunters.
Creation
of Florida Audubon Society, 1901
The Florida Audubon Society was founded to the rallying cry
"Save the Wild Birds of Florida."
Bird
Protection Act, state legislature, 1901
The Florida legislature passed a bird protection act prohibiting
the killing, capture, or shooting of deer, crocodile, and wild
birds.
Migratory
Bird Law of 1913
Congress enacted the Migratory Bird Law of 1913 to protect all
game birds not permanently within the borders of a state. The
law also made illegal the importation of wild bird plumes into
the United States.
Royal
Palm State Park on Paradise Key, 1915
The Florida Federation of Women's Clubs purchased 960 acres
of land to create the Royal Palm State Park on Paradise Key.
An equal amount of acreage was privately donated. The state
of Florida ceded an additional 2,080 acres to the Park in 1921.
Proposal
to create an Everglades National Park, 1923
The new Director of the National Park Service, Stephen Mather,
proposed that the Florida Everglades be considered for national
park status. The idea was largely ignored.
Proposal
to create a wildlife refuge and Reservation for the Seminole
Indians, 1925
Minnie Moore Wilson submitted to numerous newspapers a proposal
to create a wildlife refuge and reservation for the Seminoles
in the Florida Everglades.
Botanist
John K. Small releases "From Eden to Sahara: Florida's
Tragedy", 1929
Botanist John K. Small published "From Eden to Sahara:
Florida's Tragedy." The book chronicled the fast and furious
destruction of the Everglades, giving weight to the fledging
National Park movement.
Everglades
National Park Committee visits the Everglades, 1930
The Everglades National Park Committee visited the South Florida
area, writing in their report to the Interior Department that
the Everglades met the standards for a national park. Members
of the Senate Public Lands Committee also toured the Everglades.
Creation
of Seminole Reservation, 1930
The first state Reservation, consisting of 99,200 acres of forbidding
wilderness in the Ten Thousand Islands region of Florida, was
established for the Seminole Indians.
Creation
of Everglades National Park, 1934
Congress authorized the creation of the Everglades National
Park with 2,164,480 acres to be acquired through public and
private donations. To make the park a reality, the state of
Florida was asked to acquire over 2 million acres through public
and private donations. Several large landowners in the Everglades
met and set a minimum price for their lands of $5.00 per acre.
Big Cypress
Reservation, 1934
The state of Florida set aside 104,800 acres of swamp and marsh
land in south Florida for the Seminole Indians. More than half
of this land, however, was taken back by the government in 1951
for a drainage project.
State
Board of Conservation, state legislature, 1945
The State Board of Conservation was created by Florida legislature.
The Board was charged with protection of the state's marine,
mineral and water resources.
Dedication
of Everglades National Park, 1947
President Harry Truman dedicated 1.3 million acres for Everglades
National Park. The Everglades was the first national park to
be established because of its biologic wonders.
Marjory
Stoneman Douglas releases "The Everglades; River of Grass",
1947
Marjory Stoneman Douglas published "The Everglades; River
of Grass." The book brought about new concerns for the
environment and heightened awareness of the need to conserve
and protect the Everglades.
U.S Fish
and Wildlife Service leases Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge,
1963
The U.S Fish and Wildlife Service leased a water conservation
area in the central Everglades from the state of Florida. The
area was referred to as the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge.
Endangered
Species listing, 1967
The U.S Fish and Wildlife Service placed the Florida panther,
the snail kite, and the Cape Sable seaside sparrow on the federal
endangered species list.
Movement
to preserve Big Cypress swamp, 1968
A defeated proposal to create a jetport in the Big Cypress,
just west of the Everglades National Park, galvanized the movement
to preserve the unique Big Cypress swamp.
Designation
of Biscayne as a national monument, 1968
Congress designated Biscayne as a national monument, citing
its "rare combination of terrestrial, marine, and amphibious
life in a tropical setting of great natural beauty."
National
Environmental Protection Act of 1969
The National Environmental Protection Act of 1969 established
the U.S Environmental Protection Agency, and also required the
Army Corps of Engineers and the Central South Florida Flood
Control District to consider damage to the environment when
making management decisions.
Federal
Public Law 91-282 of 1970
Although Public Law 91-282 authorized appropriations for the
Army Corps of Engineers to accelerate canal construction, the
legislation also ensured water requirements for the Everglades
National Park by requiring not less than 315,000 acre-feet of
water be delivered annually.
Governor's
conference on Florida's water management issues, 1971
Growing concerns for preservation of the environment and a period
of extreme drought heightened awareness of water supply and
environmental problems in Florida, prompting a Governor's conference
on Florida's water management issues. The conference concluded
that water quality is deteriorating significantly and that water
quantity was insufficient during the dry season. The conference
also produced legislative action by way of the Florida Water
Resources Act of 1972.
Environment
Protection Act of 1971
Congress passed the Environmental Protection Act of 1971 allowing
Florida citizens to sue the state when environmental laws are
not enforced.
Florida
Water Resources Act, state legislature, 1972
Florida legislature passed the Florida Water Resources Act,
creating five water management districts with expanded responsibilities
for regional water resource management and environmental protection.
The Act also established fundamental water policy for Florida,
attempting to meet human needs and sustain the natural systems.
Florida
Land Conservation Act, state legislature, 1972
Florida's legislature approved the Florida Land Conservation
Act authorizing the issuance of bonds to purchase environmentally
endangered lands.
Creation
of Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, 1972
The state of Florida acquired land to create Fakahatchee Strand
State Preserve, the largest, deepest stand in the Big Cypress
Swamp, and to protect its unusual collection of rare plants
and animals.
Marine
Mammal Protection Act of 1972
Congress enacted the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 increasing
conservation and protection efforts for Florida's manatees.
Endangered
Species Act of 1973
Congress passed the Endangered Species Act of 1973, authorizing
the conservation of ecosystems that host endangered or threatened
species, as well as the conservation and protection of endangered
or threatened species themselves.
Establishment
of Big Cypress National Preserve, 1974
Congress established the Big Cypress National Preserve.
Endangered
species listing, 1975
The endemic American crocodile, whose entire North American
range was in and around Florida Bay and Biscayne Bay, was placed
on the federal endangered species list. At the time, the population
consisted of just 200 individuals, with only ten nesting females.
Kissimmee
River Restoration Act, state legislature, 1976
Florida's legislature authorized the Kissimmee River Restoration
Act, mandating the development of restoration measures in the
Kissimmee River region.
United
Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization listing,
1976
The United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization
recognized the Everglades National Park and the Dry Tortugas
as part of its international network of biosphere reserves.
Constitutional
amendment, 1976
Florida voters approved a constitutional amendment giving state
districts the authority to levy property taxes.
South
Florida Water Management District, state legislature, 1976
The Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District was
renamed the South Florida Water Management District, reflecting
the changing scope of the district's responsibilities.
Kissimmee
River Restoration Act of 1976
Congress passed the Kissimmee River Restoration Act of 1976,
authorizing a series of state and federal initiatives to restore
the integrity of the river and to retrieve some of the lost
benefits that the original pre-channelized river provided.
Florida
Manatee Sanctuary Act, state legislature, 1978
The Florida legislature enacted the Florida Manatee Sanctuary
Act, establishing speed limits in waterways frequented by manatees.
Everglades
designation as a World Heritage Site, 1979
The United Nations designated the Everglades as a World Heritage
Site.
Establishment
of Biscayne Bay National Park, 1980
Congress authorized new acquisitions of keys and reefs in Biscayne
Bay, changing the national monument's status to a national park.
Florida
Resource Rivers Act, state legislature, 1981
Florida's legislature established the "Save Our Rivers"
Program allowing water management districts to acquire environmentally
sensitive land to manage, protect and conserve the state's water
resources. The Florida Resource Rivers Act also created the
Water Management Lands Trust Fund. Receiving revenue from the
documentary stamp tax, the Department of Environmental Protection
was charged with administration of the trust fund.
Save
our Everglades Program, 1983
Florida Governor Graham launched the "Save Our Everglades"
Program with an executive order calling for restoration of the
Kissimmee River, Lake Okeechobee, and the Everglades. The Program
was the first attempt to address problems over the entire Everglades
ecosystem, not just parts of it. The state subsequently initiates
the Kissimmee River Restoration Project.
Warren
Henderson Act, state legislature, 1984
Florida's legislature passed the Warren Henderson Act of 1984,
giving authority to the Department of Environmental Protection
to protect wetlands and surface waters of the state for public
interest.
Endangered
species listing, 1984
The U.S Fish and Wildlife Services placed the wood stork on
the federal endangered species list.
Everglades
designation as a Wetland of International Importance, 1987
The Convention on Wetlands, an intergovernmental treaty providing
the framework for national action and international cooperation
for the conservation and wise use of wetlands and their resources,
designated the Everglades as a Wetland of International Importance.
Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Act, state
legislature, 1987
The Florida legislature authorized the Surface Water Improvement
and Management Act of 1987, creating the first cleanup plan
for the Everglades. The act also required the five Florida water
management districts to develop SWIM plans to clean up and preserve
Florida's rivers, lakes, estuaries, and bays.
U.S Federal
Attorney sues the state of Florida, 1988
U.S. Federal Attorney, Dexter Lehtinen, sued the state of Florida
to compel it to halt the flow of phosphorus and other pollutants
into the Everglades (U.S. v. South Florida Management District),
sparking widespread national attention. The lawsuit quickly
became lost in a tangle of countersuits, congressional hearings,
state and local investigations, and scientific studies.
Everglades
Nutrient Removal Project, 1988
The governor of Florida initiated a demonstration project for
the re-routing and treatment of runoff from the Everglades Agricultural
Area on 4000 acres of state owned land. The project involved
construction of the first manmade wetland to remove phosphorus.
Judge
rejects motion to dismiss, 1989
The South Florida Water Management District's motion to dismiss
U.S Federal Attorney Dexter Lehtinen's lawsuit was rejected.
Everglades
National Park Protection and Expansion Act of 1989
Congress authorized the Army Corps of Engineers to modify the
C&SF Project to improve water deliveries to the Everglades
National Park, and to the maximum extent practicable, take steps
to restore the natural hydrological conditions of the park.
The Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act also
authorized the purchase of 107,000 acres of land to increase
the flow of water into the eastern side of the park.
Compromise
to litigation, 1990
Florida Governor Martinez announced a compromise to federal
litigation over nutrient pollution in the Everglades.
Federal
agencies file joint comments on Everglades SWIM plan, 1990
Federal agencies jointly filed comments on the Everglades SWIM
plan.
Florida
Preservation 2000 Act, state legislature, 1990
Passage of the Florida Preservation 2000 Act in state legislature
established a coordinated land acquisition program to protect
the integrity of ecological systems and to provide multiple
benefits, including the preservation of fish and wildlife habitat,
recreation spaces, and water recharge areas.
Florida
Keys National Marine Sanctuary and Protection Act of 1990
The Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and Protection Act
established a 2,800 square-nautical-mile marine sanctuary and
a water quality protection program for the Florida Keys.
Florida
Governor ends state opposition to federal action, 1991
Florida Governor Chiles ended the state's opposition to federal
action over nutrients in the Everglades and agreed to settle
the lawsuit within six months. Governor Chiles next appeared
in court "surrendering." The Judge orally approved
settlement.
Everglades
Protection Act, state legislature, 1991
Passage of the Everglades Protection Act in state legislature
provided water management districts with clear tools for ecosystem
restoration and facilitates cooperation among regional, state,
and local agencies.
Sugar
Cane League's plan to clean up phosphorus, 1991
The Sugar Cane League offered a plan to clean up phosphorus
from the Everglades, and it filed a challenge to the area's
SWIM plans

|
Recent
Restoration Activities (1992-present)
Below is
a timeline of events establishing and implementing restoration
activities in the South Florida Everglades since 1992:
Settlement
Agreement and Consent Decree, 1992
The federal government, state of Florida, and South Florida
Water Management District entered into a Settlement Agreement
and Consent Decree. The Agreement established interim and long-term
total phosphorus concentration limits for the Loxahatchee National
Wildlife Refuge and the Everglades National Park. It also set
out in detail the steps the state of Florida must take over
the following ten years to restore and preserve water quality
in the Everglades. In addition, the Agreement called for the
construction of Stormwater Treatment Areas to meet long-term
phosphorus limits and for the establishment of a regulatory
program with agricultural best management practices.
Water
Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1992
In response to the near-ecological collapse of the Everglades
and the ongoing battle between sugar farmers and environmentalists,
Congress, through the Water Resources Development Act of 1992,
directed the Army Corps of Engineers to initiate a comprehensive
review of the C&SF Project, with a focus on restoring and
enhancing the region's natural systems while maintaining other
authorized project purposes. The Act authorized the Interagency
South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, and also required
that local interests provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way;
pay for the relocation of highways, highway bridges, and public
utilities which may be required for construction of project
works; hold and save the United States free from damages resulting
from construction and operation of the works; maintain and operate
all works after completion; and make a cash contribution for
each part of the work prior to its initiation.
Interagency
Federal Task Force, 1993
The federal departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Interior,
Justice, and Transportation, as well as the Army Corps of Engineers,
signed a five-year agreement establishing an Interagency Federal
Task Force. Led by the Department of Interior, the Task Force
was given the responsibility of coordinating ongoing and future
Everglades restoration efforts through consistent policies,
plans, programs, and priorities.
Everglades
Forever Act, state legislature, 1994
The Florida legislature enacted the Everglades Forever Act,
underwriting $685 million for construction, land acquisition,
and water treatment. The Act gave the South Florida Water Management
District the power to impose taxes on sugar farmers in order
to pay for the cleanup of farm runoff. It also mandated construction
of stormwater treatment areas to improve water quality in the
Everglades; it set forth preliminary water quality standards
to be met by 1997; and it authorized the District to develop
and implement best management practice regulatory programs for
treating stormwater and achieving water quality standards. The
sugar industry agreed to pay $320 million over 20 years to support
restoration efforts, with taxpayers expected to pay the remainder.
Governor's
Commission for a Sustainable Florida, 1994
Florida's Governor established the Governor's Commission for
a Sustainable Florida by Executive Order. The Commission was
charged with developing recommendations and fostering public
support for restoring the South Florida ecosystem, while maintaining
a sustainable economy and quality communities. The Commission
was admitted to an expanded Interagency Federal Task Force in
1995, along with representatives from the state of Florida and
Native American tribes.
Everglades
Nutrient Removal Project, 1995
Florida's Everglades Nutrient Removal Project, established as
a pilot stormwater treatment area for demonstrating and refining
the operation and management of constructed wetland treatment
systems, began operation. The project was quickly considered
a success, removing 112,000 pounds of phosphorus in its first
three years of operation.
Army
Corps of Engineers Reconnaissance Study, 1995
The Army Corps of Engineers released its reconnaissance study
as authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
(C&SF Project Restudy). The study helped frame issues and
set the direction for further detailed feasibility studies.
Feasibility studies were initiated following approval of the
Study Plan by Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters and the governing
board of the South Florida Water Management District. The studies
further expanded the most promising alternative restoration
proposals and recommended a plan for authorization by Congress.
Presidential
Campaign, 1996
Florida was a crucial state in the federal election outcome,
and the presidential campaign proved to be a huge catalyst for
Everglades restoration efforts. The Democrats focused a lot
of attention on their commitment to restoring the Everglades
region. Rebutting, Republican pPresidential nominee Bob Dole
included $200 million for restoration of the Everglades and
Florida Bay in the 1996 Farm Bill.
Water
Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996
The politics of the presidential campaign dealing with the Everglades
increased in momentum leading up to the presidential election.
The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 included substantial
funding to restore the Everglades, representing an ambitious
turning point, and it charged the Army Corps of Engineers to
develop a comprehensive plan for restoring the hydrology of
South Florida. The Act also established a 50-percent federal
cost-share for implementing the plan, and it authorized the
Army Corps of Engineers to appropriate $75 million to begin
immediate implementation of restoration projects deemed critical
for restoring the South Florida ecosystem. The Interagency Federal
Task Force was also expanded to become the South Florida Ecosystem
Restoration Task Force. The Task Force, with a membership encompassing
tribal, federal, state, regional, and local governments, was
charged with facilitating implementation of the South Florida
restoration effort. In this capacity, the Task Force served
as an information clearinghouse and coordinating entity that
helped guide the restoration effort and ensure fiscal accountability.
South
Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, 1996
To assist in restoration activities, the South Florida Ecosystem
Restoration Task Force appointed a Working Group made up of
Florida-based representatives of the departments of Interior,
Commerce, Agriculture, Justice, Army, and Environmental Protection
Agency. The Working Group was charged with coordinating programs
developed by the Task Force, resolving technical issues, and
implementing a wide variety of restoration programs. The Task
Force also established subgroups on science, infrastructure,
management, and public information (composed of staff from the
above departments) to assist the Working Group in making its
recommendations.
Between
1996 and 1998, subgroup and multi-agency, multidisciplinary
teams in association with the Task Force created, formulated,
and evaluated a vast array of past and present restoration proposals,
feasibility studies, and individual projects, with the primary
objective of determining the ideal components of a comprehensive
restoration plan. All modeling results and evaluations were
posted on the C&SF Project Restudy web site for the Task
Force and general public to review and comment. The Governor's
Commission for a Sustainable Florida synthesized and refined
the information. The result was an initial framework for organizing
components and developing a comprehensive plan for the C&SF
Project Restudy.
Florida
Ballot Amendments, 1996
Heavy lobbying by environmental groups resulted in three Everglades-specific
amendments on the 1996 Florida General Election ballot. The
most extreme amendment would have forced farmers to pay an additional
penny per pound of sugar produced in the Everglades Agricultural
Area in order to fund an Everglades cleanup. Voters narrowly
rejected this measure, but instead approved, by a 68-percent
margin, an amendment known as the "Polluter Pays"
amendment which required those in the Everglades Agricultural
Area who caused water pollution to be primarily responsible
for paying the costs of cleanup. Voters also approved an amendment
to establish an Everglades Trust Fund, to be administered by
the South Florida Water Management District, to conserve and
protect the Everglades. The Trust received revenue from many
sources, including Alligator Alley tolls, taxes on Everglades
agricultural producers (Everglades Forever Act), Preservation
2000 Act funds, and gifts and donations.
The sugar
industry challenged the "Polluter Pays" Amendment.
Following legal action, the Florida Supreme Court determined
that all polluters, but not taxpayers, must pay Everglades cleanup
costs and that the sugar industry was responsible for 100 percent
of the pollution it caused.
Everglades
Oversight Act, state legislature 1997
Florida legislature enacted the Everglades Oversight Act, requiring
that the South Florida Water Management District report on construction
and funding issues (including the Everglades Trust Fund), as
well as plans, permits, land acquisition agreements, modifications,
and the overall status of the Everglades Forever Act. The Act
also created the Joint Legislative Committee on Everglades Oversight.
Construction
of Stormwater Treatment Areas, 1997
Following completion of the construction of the first of six
stormwater treatment areas and implementation of best management
practices, landowners in the Everglades Agricultural Area reduced
the amount of phosphorus leaving the basin by a long-term average
of 51 percent.
President
Clinton's State of the Union Address, 1998
President Clinton's January 27th State of the Union Address
included comments on the restoration of the Florida Everglades.
C&SF
Project Restudy - final draft, 1999
The Army Corps of Engineers released the final draft of the
C&SF Project Comprehensive Restudy. The 3,500 page report
on Everglades restoration called for a series of water system
improvement projects lasting more than 38 years, with an estimated
cost of $7.8 billion. The report was produced through culmination
of the initial draft plan with a series of other project elements,
critical projects, water quality treatment projects, and miscellaneous
modifications that further improved performance of the plan,
including a number of previously authorized or underway projects.
Comprehensive
Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), 1999
The C&SF Project Restudy was given the formal name of the
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP).
Governor's
Commission for the Everglades, 1999
The Governor's Commission for the Everglades succeeded the Governor's
Commission for a Sustainable South Florida.
Water
Resources Development Act of 1999
The Water Resources Development Act of 1999 extended the Critical
Restoration Project authority until 2003, and authorizes two
pilot infrastructure projects proposed in the CERP.
President
Clinton's State of the Union Address, 2000
President Clinton's January 19th State of the Union Address
included comments on the restoration of the Florida Everglades.
Water
Resources Development Act of 2000
Congress formally approved CERP, as defined by the "Final
Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement," in the Water Resources Development Act
of 2000, and committed some $4 billion to Everglades restoration.
The act also charged that CERP construction, as well as operation
and maintenance costs, be shared equally by Florida and the
federal government; authorized four pilot projects at a total
cost of $69 million ($34.5 million federal share); authorized
ten construction projects and a monitoring program at a total
cost of $1.1 billion ($550.5 million federal share); and restricted
modifications to the C&SF Project not to exceed $206 million
($103 million federal share). Federal authorization for the
remaining features of CERP was to be requested in subsequent
WRDA proposals.
Everglades
Restoration Investment Act, state legislature, 2000
Florida's legislature passed the Everglades Restoration Investment
Act, authorizing Florida's matching funding commitment to CERP.
The Act provides $75 million per year in appropriations for
ten years to the Save Our Everglades Trust Fund and annual earmarks
of $35 million for the Florida Forever Act. In approving CERP,
Florida committed $2 billion in state resources for Everglades
restoration.
Restoring
the Everglades, an American Legacy Act of 2001
Congress passed the Restoring the Everglades an American Legacy
Act, authorizing and initiating funding for the $7.8 billion
CERP.
Federal-State
Agreement for Everglades Restoration, 2002
President George Bush and Florida Governor Jeb Bush signed an
agreement providing for Everglades restoration at a cost of
$7.8 billion to be shared between the federal and state governments.
The Agreement also committed the federal and state governments
to using water made available from the restoration plan for
the restoration of the natural system.
State
Legislature, 2002
The Florida legislature approved the use of bonding to generate
needed revenue for land acquisition related to the Everglades
restoration program. The Legislature also approved a bill limiting
citizen standing under Florida's National Environmental Protect
Act, which was attached to the Everglades bill. This provision
placed substantial limits on which groups qualify to challenge
environmentally destructive projects.
Everglades
Forever Act amendments, state legislature, 2003
Governor Jeb Bush signed Senate Bill 54A, clarifying amendments
made to the Everglades Forever Act during the Regular Session
of 2003. The amendment also provided the bonding authority for
an additional $800 million for Everglades Restoration; appropriated
a record $225 million to restoration efforts; removed the phrases
"maximum extent practicable" and "earliest practicable
date" from all parts of the amended Everglades Forever
Act; allowed for the use of moderating provisions in the water
quality standard until 2016; required the Department of Environmental
Protection to approve revisions to the Long-Term Plan; and required
that Florida implement pre-2006 phosphorus reduction technologies
as soon as possible.

|
The
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) endeavors to
restore, protect, and preserve the South Florida ecosystem. The
overarching principles that guide the plan's development and implementation
include:
-
Meeting
restoration, preservation, and protection requirements while
providing for the region's other water-related needs;
-
Incorporating
best-available science and independent scientific review;
-
Openly
including and engaging stakeholders; Ensuring full partnership
with federal, tribal, state and local agencies and taking
their views into full consideration; and
-
Creating
a flexible plan that is based on adaptive assessment and recognizing
that modifications will be made in the future based on new
information.
CERP outlines
structural and/or operational modifications that need to be
made to the original C&SF Project in order to improve the
quality of the environment; protect water quality; improve protection
of the aquifer; improve the integrity, capability, and conservation
of urban and agricultural water supplies; and improve other
water-related purposes. The concept behind CERP is to capture
and store freshwater currently discharged to the ocean and use
it during the dry season to replicate natural flow (approximately
80 percent to be used for the natural system and 20 percent
for agricultural and urban uses). This goal is to be achieved
through the removal of 240 miles of levees and canals, and the
building a network of reservoirs, underground storage wells,
and pumping stations that capture water for redistribution.
The first
cost estimate of CERP is $7.8 billion. The annual operation
and maintenance cost, including adaptive assessment and monitoring,
is estimated at $182 million.
Responsibilities for implementing CERP are shared between the
Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management
District. While implementation of the plan is expected to continue
through 2038, the projected half way point of CERP is 2010.
The timeline
and estimated funding levels for CERP implementation are shown
here:
Comprehensive
Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) implementation projected
Federal and non-Federal funding requirement and timeline from
1999 to 2039. Courtesy CERP
Although
restoration is traditionally defined as the complete recovery
of a natural system to pre-damage conditions, complete recovery
is not possible in the South Florida system. This artifact is
recognized in the CERP vision for two significant reasons:
-
There
have been substantial and irreversible reductions in the spatial
extent of the wetlands system (including an approximate 50
percent reduction in the Everglades) and in the total water
storage, timing, and flow capacities of the systems, as well
as well as permanent impacts from rising sea levels, establishment
of exotic plants and animals, subsidence, and losses of organic
soils.
-
There is a significant lack of pre-drainage quantitative,
qualitative, and ecological data available to contrast and
compare efforts.
Hence, CERP's
overall objective is to create a "new" Everglades,
one that will be different from previous systems, and one that
will be substantially healthier than the current system.
The restoration
effort aims to restore a sustainable ecosystem that preserves
the valued properties of South Florida's natural systems and
supports productive agriculture-, fishery-, tourist-based economics,
and a high quality of urban life. The basic premise is that
better water management will provide sustainability across both
human and natural systems. Therefore, the working hypothesis
is that hydrologic restoration is the prerequisite to ecosystem
restoration.
The
goals of CERP are to:
-
Enhance
ecologic values through improving the total spatial extent
of natural areas; improving habitat and functional quality;
and improving native plant and animal species abundance and
diversity.
-
Enhance
economic values and social well being through increasing availability
of fresh water (agricultural/municipal and industrial); reducing
flood damage (agricultural/urban); providing recreational
and navigation opportunities; and protecting cultural and
archeological resources and values.
|
Federal
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
U.S Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S Geological Survey
National Park Service
Bureau of Indian Affairs
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
National Ocean Service, NOAA
Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, NOAA
Natural Resource Conservation Service, Department of Agriculture
Agriculture Research Center, Department of Agriculture
Tribal
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida
Seminole Tribe of Florida
State
of Florida
South Florida Water Management District
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Service
Department of Community Affairs
Department of Environmental Protection
Department of Transportation
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Local
counties
Broward
Charlotte
Collier
Glades
Hendry
Highlands
Lee
Martin
Miami-Dade
Monroe
Okeechobee
Orange
Osceola
Palm Beach
Polk
St. Lucie
|
Funding
State
funding 1983 - 2002
|
Department
|
1983-1993
|
1994-1995
|
1995-1996
|
1996-1997
|
1997-1998
|
1998-1999
|
1999-2000
|
2000-2001
|
2001-2002
|
|
Agriculture
& Consumer Services
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4,930
|
5,174
|
6,174
|
24,700
|
8,445
|
|
Community
Affairs
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
35,240
|
37,129
|
27,248
|
31,830
|
9,800
|
|
Environmental
Protection
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
62,530
|
68,500
|
154,648
|
225,042
|
163,035
|
|
Game
& Fresh Water Fish Commission
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9,470
|
9,470
|
9,800
|
17,586
|
20,092
|
|
Transportation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9,730
|
43,535
|
3,456
|
16,104
|
4,931
|
|
South
Florida Water Management District
|
130,990
|
150,300
|
170,000
|
242,000
|
324,900
|
265,600
|
348,129
|
301,647
|
502,023
|
|
TOTAL
|
236,020
|
162,300
|
199,200
|
276,600
|
446,800
|
429,408
|
549,455
|
616,909
|
708,326
|
Federal
funding 1993 - 2002
|
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
Dept.
of Agriculture
|
4,714
|
4,933
|
4,992
|
5,481
|
5,560
|
6,799
|
9,133
|
10,604
|
9,490
|
10,143
|
|
-
ARS
|
2,814
|
3,033
|
2,092
|
2,046
|
2,025
|
3,264
|
4,045
|
4,148
|
4,193
|
4,846
|
|
-
NRCS
|
1,900
|
1,900
|
2,900
|
3,435
|
3,535
|
3,535
|
5,088
|
6,456
|
5,297
|
5,297
|
|
Army
Corp of Engineers
|
21,453
|
37,976
|
30,620
|
34,048
|
38,642
|
60,332
|
47,749
|
116,277
|
120,419
|
138,872
|
|
NOAA
|
10,947
|
12,051
|
14,283
|
14,049
|
17,633
|
18,373
|
16,307
|
18,421
|
4,264
|
4,065
|
|
Dept.
of Interior
|
38,400
|
33,237
|
54,244
|
40,878
|
57,724
|
148,363
|
144,333
|
144,521
|
50,194
|
80,680
|
|
-
Bureau of Indian Affairs
|
-
|
400
|
399
|
399
|
399
|
399
|
397
|
397
|
396
|
396
|
|
-
FWS
|
8,242
|
9,626
|
9,166
|
7,563
|
7,486
|
15,936
|
8,271
|
14,151
|
11,627
|
11,851
|
|
-
NPS
|
28,158
|
21,211
|
37,725
|
22,262
|
41,238
|
123,427
|
127,063
|
120,613
|
29,645
|
59,743
|
|
-
USGS
|
2,000
|
2,000
|
6,954
|
10,654
|
8,601
|
8,601
|
8,602
|
8,560
|
8,553
|
8,690
|
| SFER
Task Force |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,316
|
1,325
|
|
EPA
|
4,769
|
5,803
|
7,166
|
7,645
|
8,131
|
8,684
|
6,165
|
4,696
|
4,582
|
4,169
|
|
TOTAL
|
80,283
|
94,000
|
111,305
|
102,101
|
127,690
|
242,551
|
223,687
|
294,519
|
192,846
|
241,808
|

|
Achieving
Progress
The ultimate
success of CERP will be a reflection of its implementation over
more than 30 years. Successful implementation will require a
well-coordinated strategy that recognizes, first and foremost,
that ecosystem restoration is the overarching objective. CERP
will begin to reverse, in a relatively short time, the pattern
of ecological degradation that has been occurring in the natural
system for many decades.
Implementation
also will be guided by a set of principles:
-
Utilization
of interdisciplinary and interagency teams
-
Incorporation
of outreach and public involvement
-
Maintenance
of regional system focus
-
Integration
with ongoing and future projects
-
Integrated
contingency planning
-
Consideration
of water quality needs
-
Plan
evaluation through adaptive assessment
-
Addressing
of uncertainties
-
Assurances
to water users
-
Development
and refinement of models and tools
Provisions
for operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation
are key components of CERP. CERP provides annual operation and
maintenance cost estimates for the entire duration of the restoration
effort.
Adaptive
assessment is a process for evaluating how well the phases of
CERP achieve their expected objectives. These evaluations form
the foundation by which future phases of the plan can be refined.
An extensive Adaptive Assessment Program forms an integral component
of CERP and includes system-wide comprehensive and integrated
monitoring. The outcome of which will ultimately be utilized
to support CERP's goals and objectives.
The Adaptive
Assessment Program includes continued system-wide evaluation
and analysis, among other planning activities. The monitoring
program has a dual focus on the biological and hydrological
restoration objectives in the urban and rural regions and includes
hydrologic monitoring, water quality monitoring, and physical
process monitoring.

Schematic
flow chart of the adaptive assessment process and how it is
anticipated to function. Courtesy of CERP

|
|
|
|