|
Air
Pollution
Briefings | Policy & Legislation | Mercury
Output-Based Emission Policy Site | Additional
Materials and Links
Materials
now available from the BRIEFING:
Output-Based Allocations for Multi-Pollutant Legislation: A
flexible way to spur efficiency in Emission Trading Programs.
(Friday, July 25, 10-11am, Russell Senate Office Building, Room
SR-236)
NEMW
Report Release & Briefing:
Output-Based Emission Regulation: A Way to Recognize Cleaner
Technologies in Multi-Pollutant Legislation, February 6,
2003.
Output-Based
Emission Regulations are a means to recognize the air quality
benefits of cleaner power technologies within environmental regulations.
For multi-pollutant legislation being debated today, this comes
into play in the way that allocations will be distributed. An
output basis would be an environmentally-friendly method. Learn
about this alternative approach, where it's already being used
or recommended federally, in the states, and in models; and how
it fits within the current clean air-clean energy policy debates
on the Hill.
Briefing: Clean Air Act 101: Current Issues Surrounding
New Source Review and Multi-Pollutant Proposals, February
8, 2002, U.S. Capitol, Room SC-4
Major
changes in our country's clean air regulations are being considered
by both Congress and the Administration that will affect power
plants and their emissions. Please join us for a briefing on New
Source Review (NSR) and multi-pollutant legislation from the perspectives
of industry and the environmental community. Learn what NSR is
and the controversy surrounding proposals to change the way that
older coal-fired power plants are regulated. Hear about various
multi-pollutant proposals introduced in the House and Senate,
including S.556,
a "4-pollutant" bill currently being considered in the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee, and a 3-pollutant approach
being developed by the Administration. Speakers from all sides
of the debate will discuss these issues, how they are interrelated,
and the debates that led to their consideration. The briefing
was hosted by the House and Senate Northeast-Midwest Coalitions
along with the U.S. Combined Heat and Power Association.
Glossary
of Acronyms from Briefing
Speakers:
Joel
Bluestein, President, Environment and Energy Analysis.
As an expert on the development and market effects of the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendments, Mr. Bluestein has extensive and direct
experience with emissions trading programs, regulations, and related
permitting issues.
John
D. Walke, Senior Attorney and Director of Clean
Air Programs at the Natural Resources Defense Council. Before
joining the NRDC, Mr. Walke worked at the EPA's General Counsel
office as primary attorney responsible for the operating permits
program under Title V of the Clean Air Act.
Scott
Segal, Partner, Bracewell & Patterson. Mr. Segal represents
the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, a coalition of
large utilities including Southern Company, Duke Power, FirstEnergy,
Progress Energy, and others.
Briefing:
Multi-Pollutant Reduction Strategies, National Building
Museum
(January
14, 2002)
This
gathering involved presentations and a dialogue regarding current
multi-pollutant strategies being introduced or to be introduced
in Congress addressing New Source Review (NSR), the Clean Air Act
(CAA), and climate change initiatives. The discussion highlighted
how innovative technologies-such as combined heat and power and
distributed generation-can assist multi-pollutant reduction strategies.
The speakers were: David
Bassett of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Power Technology,
and Joel Bluestein,
President, Energy & Environmental Analysis, Inc. Both have extensive
knowledge and history with various initiatives created over the
years and with potential legislative paths we might look to in the
future. Sponsored by the US Combined
Heat & Power Association, the American
Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, and the Northeast-Midwest
Institute.
Dave
Bassett Presentation (pdf)
A group
supporting clean power is promoting the use of output-based emission
allocations in any multi-pollutant legislation. The Northeast-Midwest
Institute is a member of this coalition and is working to educate
policymakers and other stakeholders on the benefits of output based
allocations, like that in the Carper bill. A letter to Congress
in support of output based allocations has been drafted and signatories
are now coming forward.
The
Northeast-Midwest Institute February 2003 report: Output-Based
Emission Standards: Advancing Innovative Energy Technologies,
highlights the concept of an output-based approach for a variety
of emissions regulations and details state, federal and international
activities. In addition, a June 2003 report commissioned by the
US Combined Heat and Power Association provides detailed analysis
of the output-based
allocation method and comparisons to the other methods.
Senator
Carper's Clean Air Planning Act (S
843)
On
July 14th, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) joined Sen. Chafee (R-RI)
and Sen. Gregg (R-NH) as a cosponsor of this bipartisan bill.
Senator
Carper of Delaware and NEMW Coalition member introduced a bipartisan
multi-pollutant bill, S 843, on April 9, 2003. His bill offers greater
human health and environmental benefits than the administration's
"Clear Skies" proposal, for only a minimal additional
cost. The Carper bill requires reductions in emissions of SO2, NOx,
CO2 and mercury at power plants. The reductions are more stringent
than that of the Administration's proposal and cover four pollutants
"4P" where as "Clear Skies" does not address
CO2. An Energy
Daily article from July 2, 2003 details the EPA cost-benefit
analysis of differences between the Carper and Adminstration proposals.
The
Senator first introduced his multi-pollutant bill in the 107th Congress,
which bridged the gap between proposals offered by Sen. Jeffords
and the Administration. The Carper bill called for NOx and Hg allocations
on a per-megawatt-hour output basis, which would be calculated on
a three-year rolling average. It also stated that the EPA shall
promulgate regulations that ensured CHP systems received equitable
issuance of allowances. As for CO2, allowances would also
be allocated on an output basis, using a three-year rolling average.
However, there was no specific mention of CHP or thermal crediting.
SO2 retained the Acid Rain program structure with a few minor amendments;
the current structure employs an input-based allocation system.
The emission cap on annual tonnage of SO2 was to be tightened.
Visit
Senator Carper's website
for more information on his bill and links to recent articles on
the Carper and Bush bills.
Senator
Jeffords' Clean Power Act (S
366)
Sen.
Jeffords of Vermont, and past Co-Chair of the Northeast-Midwest
Senate Coalition, reintroduced his 4-P bill in the 108th Congress
on February 12, 2003. Last year, his bill (S 556) was passed by
the Environment and Public Works Committee during the 107th Congress.
Sen. Jeffords has been an advocate for clean air legislation for
many years. Visit Senator
Jeffords' website for additional news on his clean air initiatives.
The
Administration's Clear Skies Act of 2003 (HR
999, S
485)
Of
the multi-pollutant bills introduced, the "Clear Skies"
proposal has the least-stringent emission targets and does not address
carbon dioxide. It is a "3P" proposal. The House
Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality held a hearing on July
8th entitled "The Clear Skies Initiative: A Multipollutant Approach
to the Clean Air Act," at which EPA Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation, Jeff Holmstead, testified.
- Rep.
Barton and Rep. Tauzin (by request) introduced HB 999 on Feb.
27, 2003. It was referred to the Energy and Commerce Committee.
It was referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality
on March 17.
- Sen.
Inhofe and Sen. Voinovich (by request) introduced SB 485 on Feb.
27, 2003. It was referred to the Environment and Public Works
Committee. On April 8, 2003, the Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate
Change, and Nuclear Safety held hearings.
EPA's
Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act
Timeline
of Major Events Related to New Source Review (Feb 2002)
Glossary
of Acronyms from Multi-Pollutant Briefing (Feb 2002)
For
more information, contact Susan
Freedman at the Institute.
Energy
Home | Home
| Top of Page
http://www.nemw.org/energy_multiP.htm |