Nonindigenous species invasions from ship ballast-water discharges are a
growing ecological problem in coastal and inland waters throughout the world. Several of
these invasions have been very dramatic and have caused widespread change to marine and
freshwater ecosystems, as well as significant damage to living resources and other water
uses.
There is consensus among scientific communities and regulatory agencies that future
nonindigenous species invasions should be prevented. The present means to prevent
introduction of aquatic species is for ships to exchange ballast water in the mid ocean.
In many cases, however, ocean exchange is neither possible nor practical because of the
design or operation of the vessels, or because the vessels do not transit open ocean
waters.
This study evaluates three ballast-treatment technologiesultraviolet radiation
(UV), thermal (heat), and acoustic (ultrasonics)for potential application to
secondary treatment of ballast water. The shipboard use and biological effectiveness of
the three treatment technologies were evaluated against no-, 250-m
m-, 100-m m-, and 25-m
m-pretreatment filtration scenarios; at 1,200 and 8,000-gmp flow rates; and water intake
temperature of 35-45 ºF (2-7 ºC). The specifications complement the shipboard tests
currently underway by Northeast-Midwest Institute and the Lake Carriers Association
in the Great Lakes Ballast Technology Demonstration Project.
The principle component of this study was a survey of manufacturers and vendors of
secondary treatment technologies. Thirty-eight vendors were contacted and 15 vendors
provided useful information relevant to the current state of the three technologies.
Additional technology information and performance data were obtained from published
information, as well as from researchers working with water and wastewater disinfection.
This report summarizes the current state of development of the three secondary
treatment technologies, including predicated biological effectiveness against
nonindigenous microorganisms, robustness of the equipment, safety issues, and
environmental concerns about using the technology aboard commercial vessels.
The conclusion of this report is that UV is currently the technology best suited for
secondary treatment of ballast water. UV treatment technology is well developed, has many
vendors producing equipment for a variety of applications, and, of the three options
examined, shows the best potential for shipboard trials.
Ultrasonics technology also shows promise for the application to ballast water
treatment. Compared to UV, ultrasonics does not need as much pretreatment filtration and
has fewer potential side effects and safety issues. Ultrasonics technology is, however,
more expensive and is not yet developed for high-volume treatment.